Silage Storage Calculator

Estimate stored silage tonnage from bunker or pile dimensions and packed density, plus how many feeding-days that supply covers your herd.

Frequently Asked Questions

What packed density should I use for corn silage vs haylage?

A well-packed corn silage bunker typically runs 40-45 lb/cu ft as-fed; 44 lb/cu ft is a reasonable default. Haylage and grass silage typically pack a bit lighter, roughly 35-40 lb/cu ft; 38 lb/cu ft is a reasonable default. Both figures assume good packing practice - thin layers, adequate packing weight, and enough time on the pile. Weigh a known volume of your own silage if you want a site-specific number.

Why does the calculator ask for the silage's own dry-matter percent as well as the animal's intake percent?

They answer two different questions. The animal's intake percent (commonly 2-3.5% of body weight) tells you how many pounds of dry matter the animal needs to eat. The silage's dry-matter percent (commonly 30-40% for corn silage, higher for wilted haylage) tells you how many as-fed, wet pounds of silage contain that much dry matter. Skipping the second conversion badly overstates feeding-days, because a lot of silage's as-fed weight is water the animal doesn't get nutrition from.

How much storage and feed-out loss should I plan for?

A well-managed, well-sealed bunker or pile commonly loses about 7-15% of its dry matter to spoilage at the exposed face, the top crust, and any effluent runoff. Poorly packed, poorly sealed, or long, slow-feeding piles can lose 20% or more. The default of 10% here is a reasonable middle estimate for a reasonably well-managed operation; tighten it toward 7-8% for excellent management (tight plastic, gravel bags, fast feed-out) or widen it toward 15-20% if the pile sits uncovered or is fed out slowly.

Should I use the tallest point of the pile or an average height?

Use an average packed height, not the tallest point. Bunker piles and drive-over piles are almost never a flat-topped rectangular block - they typically crown in the middle and taper at the edges - so measuring only the peak overstates the volume. Taking a few height readings across the pile and averaging them (or estimating a trapezoidal cross-section by hand) gives a more realistic volume than a single peak measurement.

Does this work for upright (tower) silos too?

The tonnage math (volume × density) still applies, but a rectangular-prism volume formula does not match a cylindrical tower silo's shape, and packed density in a tower increases with depth from the weight of the material above rather than staying uniform. This calculator is built for rectangular bunkers and drive-over piles; for a cylindrical tower silo, use a cylinder-volume calculation with an average density figure appropriate to the fill depth.

Important Disclaimer: Estimates for informational purposes only.

This calculator provides estimates for informational purposes only. Results are based on assumptions and may not reflect actual outcomes. Consult qualified professionals in relevant fields before making important decisions based on these results.